Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Invitational Education Theory and Unconditional Positive Regard Can Support One’s Grief

 

Grief deeply affects cognition, motivation, relationships, and a person’s sense of safety. Applying an intentionally caring, optimistic, respectful, and trusting (ICORT) mindset (Anderson, 2021) helps leaders and teachers create environments where individuals feel psychologically safe, supported, and valued. Grounded Invitational Education Theory Purkey & Novak, 2015) and unconditional positive regard (Rogers, 1956), the goal is not to fix grief but rather to honor it while sustaining connection, dignity, and hope. Leaders and staff may benefit from the following actionable strategies applicable across contexts, followed by role-specific applications.

Caring is an ICORT assumption that suggests making support visible and consistent.  Acknowledging the loss directly but gently make simply be: “I’m really sorry for what you’re going through.” Offering presence rather than solutions acknowledges that grief is not a problem to solve. Checking in periodically and providing small, meaningful gestures such as notes, flexibility, or a quiet space reduces isolation and signals, “You matter here.”

Communicating belief in the person’s ability to navigate grief over time expresses optimism that can help one hold onto hope without dismissing pain.  This normalizes the ups and downs as “There’s no right timeline for this…”  Highlighting support systems and strengths without forcing positivity helps to sustain hope while validating reality.

Honoring individual grieving styles is respectful.  Avoid assumptions about how someone “should” grieve.  Rather, respect cultural, spiritual, and personal differences by inviting choices: talking vs. not talking, participating vs. stepping back; helps to preserve dignity and autonomy.

Empowering one’s agency and voice exhibits trust.  This assumption allows the individual to guide what is needed.  Maintaining confidentiality and avoiding micromanagement of performance or emotional expression builds psychological safety and self-efficacy.

Ine the workplace, effective leaders normalize grief in professional spaces.  With permission, one’s loss should be publicly acknowledged.  This is an opportunity to appropriately model vulnerability: “I don’t have the perfect words, but I care.”

Offering flexible structures is an extremely powerful response.  Minimally, adjust workloads, deadlines, or schedules.  Providing options such as remote work, leave, temporarily reduced expectations establishes an ICORT mindset by moving beyond people to the workplace, policies, and programs that establish an inviting culture.   

Training managers in grief-informed responses teaches listening skills over “fixing” people.  Discouraging toxic positivity is part of this training.  This avoids ever saying something like, “Everything happens for a reason.”

Creating support systems is an ongoing process.  Peer support groups or buddy systems will evolve so need to be monitored and adjusted.  Access to counseling or Employee Assistance Programs should be more than a blurb in the employee handbook.

Maintaining connection without pressure exhibits ICORT. Inviting, but not requiring participation, keep the individual included in communication loops on his or her terms.  Ideally, the leadership stance is perceived as, “You are valued here beyond your productivity.”

In the classroom context, teachers should seek to create emotionally safe environments.  Providing an intentionally caring, optimistic, respectful, and trusting (ICORT) classroom establishes the norm that emotions are acceptable.   Thereafter, predictable routines and stability supports grieving students.   

Respectfully, adjust academic expectations. Offer extensions or alternative assignments. Break tasks into smaller, manageable pieces

With care, provide expression outlets. Journaling, art, or optional sharing empowers through choice. Literature or discussions can normalize grief experiences as real and relevant.

Yes, watch for behavioral changes.  Grief may show up as withdrawal, irritability, or lack of focus. Optimistically respond with curiosity, not punishment

Willingly collaborate with caregivers and support staff.  With sensitivity and consent, communicate with counselors and families.  This ensures more consistent support across environments.  The ideal teaching stance should be, “You belong here exactly as you are today.”

Use language that reflects an ICORT mindset (Purkey, Novak, & Fretz, 2020; Anderson 2021) and unconditional positive regard (Rodgers, 1956). Rather than saying,

  • “You need to stay strong.”
  • “Let’s get you back to normal.”

Use:

  • “I’m here with you. Take the time you need.”
  • “There’s no right way to feel right now.”
  • “How can I best support you today?”

Leaders and teachers are advised to avoid common pitfalls:

  • Minimizing loss.  Avoid “At least…” statements.
  • Rushing the grieving process.
  • Treating everyone the same.  Embrace the reality that grief is highly individualized.
  • Overstepping boundaries.  Do not try to force conversations or disclosure.

An ICORT mindset (Purkey, Novak, & Fretz, 2020;; Anderson 2021) and unconditional positive regard (Rodgers, 1956) does not remove grief.  They do transform the environment around grief.  When leaders and teachers consistently and intentionally communicate care, optimism, respect, and trust, they create conditions where individuals can grieve without losing their sense of belonging or worth.

The following ICORT Quick-Reference Checklist for Supporting Grief may an intentional resource for your leadership or pedagogical toolbox:

 CARING — “You matter here.”

Acknowledge the loss with empathy (no clichés)

Check in regularly (not just once)

Offer presence, not solutions

Provide small supports (notes, flexibility, quiet space)

OPTIMISTIC — “There is hope, even in hard moments.”

Normalize grief as a process (no timeline)

Encourage without forcing positivity

Gently remind them of strengths and supports

Be patient with ups and downs

RESPECTFUL — “Your experience is valid.”

Avoid assumptions about how they “should” grieve

Honor cultural, personal, and emotional differences

Offer choices (talk / not talk, engage / step back)

Protect dignity and privacy

TRUSTING — “You are capable and in control.”

Let them guide what they need

Maintain confidentiality

Avoid micromanaging work or emotions

Empower autonomy in decisions and participation

FOR LEADERS

Offer flexible workload, deadlines, or schedule

Keep communication open and inclusive (no pressure)

Connect staff to support resources (EAP, counseling)

Model empathy and appropriate vulnerability

FOR TEACHERS

Provide academic flexibility (extensions, alternatives)

Maintain predictable routines for stability

Offer optional expression outlets (journaling, art)

Respond to behavior changes with curiosity, not punishment

HELPFUL LANGUAGE

“I’m here for you.”

“Take the time you need.”

“There’s no right way to feel.”

“How can I support you today?”

AVOID

“At least…” statements

Rushing recovery or “moving on”

Forcing conversations or participation

Treating everyone the same

A DAILY REMINDER

Intentionally lead with care. Hold hope (optimism). Honor individuality (respect). Build trust.

 

 

To cite:

Anderson, C.J. (March 31, 2026). Invitational education theory and unconditional positive regard can support one’s grief [Web log post] Retrieved from http://www.ucan-cja.blogspot.com/

 

 

References

Anderson, C. J. (2021). Developing your students' emotional intelligence and philosophical  perspective begins with I-CORT. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 27, 36-50.

 Purkey, W. W., & Novak, J. M. (2015). Fundamentals of invitational education. (2nd Ed) International Alliance for Invitational Education. Retrieved from: Fundamental of Invitational Education | IAIE

 Purkey, W.W., Novak, J.M., & Fretz, J.R. (2020). Developing inviting schools: A beneficial framework for teaching. Teachers College Press.

 Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357