Increasing
student engagement and promoting critical thinking in asynchronous discussion
board (Db) forums, requires a blend of thoughtful instructional design,
facilitation strategies, and clear expectations. This is especially true for
asynchronous teacher preparation courses whereby Db forums have the potential
to be professional development for developing crucial pedagogical skills. Novice teachers and teacher candidates alike
will benefit from being intentionally invited to practice asking questions that
invite further learner engagement.
Discussion
board (Db) forums can be an effective alternative to relying upon “pop
quizzes” to ensure students are reading course texts or materials. Thoughtful strategies to reduce
the trend toward “aliteracy” will help improve active student learning. The
use of discussion
boards is an alternative that can actually promote reading of course
material by requiring thoughtful, critical, written responses to divergent
questions related to the topical reading material.
Respective
of the post-COVID embrace for on-line graduate programs and higher education’s
increasing shift toward asynchronous education, this month’s article will
discuss key researchers and their relevant studies from the past five years. Research
by Hewson and Eaton (2021), Farmer and Capshaw (2020). Moore and Veletsianos
(2020), Costa (2020), as well as Carr-Chellman and Menchaca (2019) addressed
refining best practices for engaging learners in asynchronous learning
environments.
Research-based
practices result in strategies that can be effectual for developing discussion
board (Db) forums that provide the opportunity to promote higher
order thinking skills (HOTS).
Instructors setting up effective Db topics with rigor can empower
students to take ownership of their learning and professional development. Educators
are invited to consider the following strategies to utilize Discussion Board
Forums to promote active student learning and collegial engagement:
- Design discussion prompts that are directly aligned with learning objectives, which encourages students to see the relevance of the discussions in relation to their future teaching practices.
- Encourage students to connect the discussion topics with real-world teaching scenarios, drawing on their own experiences or hypothetical situations. This bridges theory and practice, helping to deepen critical thinking.
- Develop prompts that require analysis, synthesis, or evaluation (higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy) rather than simple recall of facts. These might include case studies, controversial issues, or reflective scenarios in education.
- Encourage students to assume different roles, such as the teacher, parent, or administrator, to view the issue from different perspectives. This helps to foster empathy and critical reflection.
- Start with more guided, lower-level questions that establish foundational knowledge, and gradually introduce more complex, open-ended questions that require students to critique, debate, or create new ideas.
- Explicate a structure where students must first respond to the instructor’s prompt, then reply to their peers in a way that builds upon or challenges ideas.
- Schedule for active facilitation: Instructor presence is key in asynchronous discussions. The facilitator should model critical thinking in their responses, ask probing follow-up questions, and encourage deeper analysis or consideration of alternative perspectives.
- Provide constructive feedback that acknowledges good contributions and suggests ways to deepen responses. This could include pointing out strong arguments, highlighting overlooked angles, or suggesting additional readings.
- Assign students to moderate or lead discussions. When students take ownership of the discussion, they tend to engage more deeply, and it promotes a sense of responsibility for fostering critical dialogue.
- Encourage students to not only respond to the instructor but to engage in dialogue with peers by building on their ideas, challenging their assumptions, or asking for clarification. This promotes a collaborative learning environment.
- Design discussions that bring in diverse cultural, social, and theoretical perspectives related to teaching practices. This invites students to think critically about how different worldviews and experiences might impact teaching and learning.
- Encourage discussion responses around issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion in education. This can promote mindfulness (Costa, 2020) and help students reflect on broader societal implications and challenge their own assumptions.
- Be unafraid to allow students consider multiple points of view on an issue related to education. This helps to sharpen critical thinking by forcing students to support their arguments with evidence and reasoning.
- Allow students to engage with content and each other through different media such as video responses, infographics, concept maps, etc. (Cohn, 2021). This not only diversifies the discussion but can also help students express complex ideas in creative ways.
- Expect students to support their arguments with research, making it a practice to reference course readings or additional scholarly sources. This helps to solidify evidence-based thinking.
- Use rubrics that clearly define what constitutes quality participation, focusing on the depth of analysis, integration of course content, and the ability to engage meaningfully with peers. This can help set expectations for critical thinking.
- Set concrete expectations for the quantity and quality of posts. A little structure is very liberating.
- The participation criteria should identify the due date for initial responses and the minimum number of responses to peers or the instructor per week.
- Requirements for originality, research, and peer engagement are essential. Ensure that quality is emphasized over quantity.
- Incorporate opportunities for self-reflection based on peer feedback, which promotes responsibility for one's own learning and increases critical thinking about both the content and the process of discussion (Carr-Chellman & Menchaca, 2019).
- Asking students to reflect on their own learning and how their thinking has evolved during the discussion promotes metacognition.
- This could be done in the form of a wrap-up post that encourages students to synthesize the main points of the discussion
As
an effective formative assessment approach, implementing these strategies during
teacher preparation courses encourages self-regulated learners. Hewson and Eaton (2021) suggest
self-regulated students are more likely to engage deeply with asynchronous course
content, think critically, and connect theory to practice, all of which is
beneficial to an educator’s future professional practice.
Presenting
clear discussion board policies with
established expectations for both students and the instructor(s) promote
success. Establishing the expectations
at the beginning of the semester and following through is key to students’
respecting expectations. Moore
and Veletsianos (2020) explored the role of instructional design and learner
interaction in fostering engagement in asynchronous environments. Their work explored
how digital technologies can enhance engagement when instructors emphasize the
importance of empathy, personalization, and support to reduce feelings of
isolation during asynchronous learning.
Intentionally inviting processes for Db forum engagement can help
balance ethe need for human connection and the desire for critical thinking.
Workload
is certainly a factor for asynchronous, online learning. Farmer
and Capshaw ‘s (2020) researched cognitive load and scaffolding in asynchronous
learning environments. Course design helps
students manage the amount of information they process. Considering this need,
the following models can provide
helpful starting points for establishing Discussion Board (Db) Forum expectation
for scholarship and peer engagement:
Model
1: Students must post their initial response to the course
module’s first discussion prompt by the second day of the class week. A response to the course module’s second discussion
prompt must be posted by day 4 of the course week. This model requires the active discussion to
be between each student and the instructor.
It does not promote active on-line engagement between students.
Model 2:
Students must post their initial response to the course module’s first discussion
prompt by the second day of the class week.
Each student must then respond to at least two classmates’ initial
response. The first response to a classmate
should be the fourth day of the course week.
The second response to a classmate should be no later than the sixth day
of the course week. This model promotes
active on-line engagement between students and allows the instructor to monitor
participation and to selectively respond.
Establishing Participation Expectations:
Participating in any classroom discussion forum is essential to the learning
experience. By participating in the (weekly)
discussions students and instructors share experiences, investigate complicated
subject matter, share expertise, and examine the content from new perspectives.
An instructor should credit participation
based on the following:
- Initial posts of 75-100 words should follow a
prescribed style/format (APA,
2010) and exhibit word processing
before posting. The initial post
should integrate course theories with a practical application of the
subject. For example, the student
should offer a personal observation or experience, or reference real-world
examples, current events, or cite research conducted on the topic.
- Follow-up responses to classmates’ initial posts should
be 40-60 words and:
- Promote interaction in
classroom discussion by demonstrating deeper or broader thoughts about the
topic
- Mitigates rephrasing what the
textbook or another student already stated.
- Encourage further discussion
and ongoing dialogue with other students in the class.
- Present communications that
are professional and supportive, using a respectful tone.
- Exhibit proofreading and
contain minimal errors in writing mechanics.
Discussion board questions should be topical, thereby
promoting analysis of the course materials or relevant reading. Clear expectations should require synthesis
of thought in order to effectively respond.
While a convergent question may draw the student in, a divergent
question is needed to promote HOTS and increase the fidelity and thoroughness
of the discussion. In this regard,
including the expectation to ask a follow-up question in the responses to peers
should be part of the Db forum’s grading criteria (rubric). After all, the Db forum should be professional development: Teachers NEED to ask
analytical questions.
To Cite:
Anderson, C.J. (September 30, 2024) Inviting
increased learner engagement to promote critical thinking during asynchronous
discussion board forums. [Web log post] Retrieved from http://www.ucan-cja.blogspot.com/
References:
Carr-Chellman,
A. A., & Menchaca, M. (2019). "Facilitating critical reflection and
engagement in asynchronous teacher preparation courses." International
Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 5(2), 45–58.
Cohn, J.
(2021). Skim, Dive, Surface: Teaching Digital Reading in the College Classroom.
Costa, K.
(2020). 100 Ways to Make Learning Awesome for Distance Learners.
Farmer, H.,
& Capshaw, T. K. (2020). "Cognitive load theory and learner
engagement: Implications for asynchronous learning design." Online
Learning Journal, 24(1), 15-35.
Hewson, K.,
& Eaton, S. E. (2021). "Self-regulated learning and asynchronous
online learning: Insights and practical applications for educators."
Journal of Distance Education.
Moore, S. L.,
& Veletsianos, G. (2020). "Learner experiences with personalized
learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study." Journal of Online
Learning Research, 6(1), 23–46.