Wednesday, May 31, 2023

Integrating Universal Design for Learning Principles to Effectively Differentiate Instruction.

 The teacher's knowledge of the three Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles - Multiple Means of Engagement, Representation, and Expression/Action - is crucial in helping differentiate instruction.  Yes, understanding The UDL Guidelines improves the effectiveness of differentiating the lesson’s four key elements:  content, process, product, and students’ affect related to the learning environment.  For instance, by understanding and applying the principles of Multiple Means of Engagement, the teacher can present content in a variety of ways, such as visual aids, audio recordings, or hands-on activities, to cater to students with diverse learning preferences. This can help students better comprehend and retain information and engage more effectively with the lesson.

Similarly, by using Multiple Means of Representation, the teacher can provide different avenues for students to demonstrate their understanding of the content. For example, students can express their learning through written assignments, oral presentations, or visual projects. This approach can help students showcase their strengths and preferences while also providing opportunities for growth.

Finally, the principle of Multiple Means of Expression/Action emphasizes the importance of providing students with various ways to engage in the learning process. For example, students can choose to work independently, in pairs, or in groups, and can use different tools and technologies to complete tasks. This approach can help students feel more invested in their learning and increase their motivation and engagement.

Instructional strategies need to be sensitive to the needs and abilities of diverse learners. Teachers who are intentionally inviting, plan effective differentiated instruction based on content, process, product students’ affect related to the learning environment. This exhibits an embrace of the following:

1.    Students have different learning styles: Students have different ways of processing information, and what works for one student may not work for another. By considering different instructional approaches, a teacher can better reach all students and help them learn in a way that is most effective for them.

2.    Students have different levels of understanding: Not all students come into the classroom with the same level of understanding or background knowledge (Van Garderen, 2015). Differentiated instruction allows a teacher to meet students where they are and provide instruction that is appropriate for their level of understanding (Subban, 2006).

3.    Students have different needs: Some students may need more support or challenge than others. By considering differentiated instruction, a teacher can provide targeted instruction to meet the needs of all students (Wormeli, 2017).

 

Therefore, differentiating the key elements of the lesson’s content, process, and product positively impacts the students’ affect related to the learning environment, which is observed by increased student engagement and motivation: By using diverse approaches, planning different instructional strategies, and offering choice, teachers can keep students engaged and self-motivated. The ensuing increased student participation in turn leads to higher levels of learning and achievement.

By providing tailored support and challenge, promoting collaboration and inquiry-based learning, using effective formative feedback, integrating technology, and building positive relationships, teachers can create a classroom environment that is respectful, engaging, and conducive to learning.

In summary, a teacher's knowledge of the UDL principles of Multiple Means of Engagement, Representation, and Expression/Action can help them differentiate instruction effectively by providing a range of options for students to access content, demonstrate their learning, and engage in the learning process.

You are invited to access the university’s ERIC or EBSCO data bases and to then download the following articles.  These theorists researched the synthesis between UDL and differentiation.  Reading and adding their suggestions to your pedagogical toolbox should be beneficial in the short and long term…:

To cite:

Anderson, C.J. (May 31, 2023). Integrating Universal Design for Learning principles to effectively differentiation instruction. [Web log post] Retrieved from http://www.ucan-cja.blogspot.com/

References:

 Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2016). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.

Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2011). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. National Center on Universal Design for Learning.

 Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ASCD.

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935-947. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ854351


Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.

 Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD.

 

Van Garderen, D. (2015). Differentiating instruction in elementary mathematics: Challenges and strategies. Routledge.

 

Wormeli, R. (2017). Fair isn't always equal: Assessment and grading in the differentiated classroom. Stenhouse Publishers. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592455

Monday, May 1, 2023

Developing Instructional Plans Based on Students’ Academic Achievement, Functional Performance, and Funds of Identity

 A teacher's knowledge of her students' academic achievement (Johnson & Nelson, 2018), functional performance (Suldo, Friedrich, White, Farmer, Minch, & Michalowski, 2017), and Funds of Identity (Gay, 2018; Gonzalez , Moll, & Amanti 2005) is the foundation for effective, differentiated lesson planning.  Why is it crucial to know these elements of the classroom if your goal is develop effective instructional lesson plans?  Consider the following:

1.    Academic Achievement: Understanding the academic achievement level of each student in the class enables the teacher to tailor the instruction to meet the specific needs of each student. This knowledge helps the teacher to differentiate instruction by identifying areas where students need extra support or challenge.

2.    Functional Performance: Functional performance refers to a student's ability to perform daily living skills, such as communication, social skills, and self-care. By understanding a student's functional performance level, a teacher can incorporate activities and strategies into the lesson plan that support the development of these skills.

3.    Funds of Identity: The Funds of Identity refer to the cultural, linguistic, and personal experiences that students bring to the classroom. Incorporating students' Funds of Identity into the lesson plan helps to create a culturally responsive learning environment, which can increase student engagement and learning.

The teacher's knowledge of her students' academic achievement, functional performance, and Funds of Identity allows her to create a lesson plan that is tailored to meet the specific needs of each student, leading to better academic and personal outcomes.  This is just part of the goal.  How comfortable are you with developing or even using rubrics as an effective formative assessment tool for measuring and analyzing student learning?

Rubrics provide a clear framework for evaluating student performance on specific learning objectives (Andrade, 2005).  Formative assessment provides ongoing feedback to students that can be used to guide instruction and improve student outcomes (Black & Wiliam, 1998). By treating rubrics and formative assessment as complimentary, teachers can collect a wealth of data on student learning that can be used to analyze trends and patterns over time. Rubrics help to standardize the evaluation process and provide a common language for discussing student performance, while formative assessment helps to identify areas where students are struggling and where additional support may be needed.

With this data, teachers can then use data-based analysis to make informed decisions about instructional strategies and interventions. For example, if a teacher notices that many students are consistently struggling with a particular concept, they may use this data to adjust their instruction or provide additional resources to support student learning.  Yes, using rubrics with formative assessment processes can lead to effective data-based analysis of student learning by providing teachers with consistent and meaningful data on student performance that can be used to make informed decisions about instruction and interventions (Heritage, 2010).

Obviously, it is important to develop instructional plans that are sensitive to the academic achievement, functional performance, and Funds of Identity exhibited by your students. To benefit your teaching and your students’ learning, you are invited to access your University’s Libraries’ EBSCO or ERIC databases. Then, review and bookmark the following references.  They are valuable resources for your pedagogical toolbox.

To cite:

Anderson, C.J. (April 30, 2023). Developing instructional plans based on students’ academic achievement, functional performance, and Funds of Identity. [Web log post] Retrieved from        http://www.ucan-cja.blogspot.com/

 

References:

Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/using-rubrics-to-promote-thinking-and-learning

 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171908000205

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.)              Teachers College Press.

Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices            in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates         Publishers.

 

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom.  Corwin Press.

Johnson, C. L., & Nelson, M. J. (2018). Understanding student academic achievement:             The role of teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8(1), 27-38. doi: 10.5590/JERAP.2018.08.1.03

Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J. (2017).             Teacher support and student functional performance: A mixed-methods investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.12.001